Spherical 2 NBA mock draft – Greatest out there gamers, predictions

The second spherical of the 2025 NBA draft begins at 8 p.m. ET on Thursday on ESPN.

Day 1 featured Duke phenom Cooper Flagg on the high of the board to the Dallas Mavericks, the New Orleans Pelicans buying and selling as much as No. 13 to take Maryland middle Derik Queen, together with a number of attention-grabbing picks and trades all through.

What’s in retailer for Day 2? Let’s discuss via the largest questions heading into Spherical 2 and mission picks Nos. 31 via 59 with an up to date mock draft.

Who’re the most effective gamers nonetheless out there? First-round-caliber prospects equivalent to Rasheer Fleming, Maxime Raynaud and Noah Penda might go early Thursday. Which staff is about as much as have an intriguing Spherical 2? And which under-the-radar prospects might flip into steals?

ESPN’s Jonathan Givony and Jeremy Woo are right here that can assist you navigate Spherical 2, with the assistance of their high 100 rankings. The mock draft write-ups under are from prospects’ scouting experiences.

Extra NBA draft protection:
Mavs draft Flagg | Full Round 1 breakdown
Bailey’s surprise by Utah | Which trade got an A?
Trade tracker | Top 100 rankings | More draft

Who’s essentially the most attention-grabbing staff on Thursday?

Givony: The Hornets, with decide Nos. 33 and 34, will certainly be a hotspot for commerce talks all through the day after including two first-round picks to their roster in Kon Knueppel and Liam McNeeley. Already sporting a reasonably younger roster, it is not clear what Charlotte’s urge for food can be for including one or two extra rookies. The staff does have a transparent void to fill contained in the paint after buying and selling Mark Williams to the Suns for the No. 29 decide and a 2029 first-rounder. There are a couple of intriguing 7-footers out there in Maxime Raynaud and Ryan Kalkbrenner, together with toolsy forwards equivalent to Rasheer Fleming and Adou Thiero.

Woo: The Timberwolves maintain the facility of alternative at No. 31, not solely having dibs on whichever participant they need, but in addition the power to make use of it as a commerce chip. I am curious whether or not they seize a man like Fleming, or see extra worth in utilizing it to doubtlessly seize worth by different means.

Who’s an under-the-radar prospect you actually like who’s prone to be picked Thursday?

Givony: Noah Penda was drawing appears from groups within the first spherical because of his robust defensive versatility, passing and general really feel for the sport, however he could not acquire sufficient traction within the predraft course of as a consequence of his streaky taking pictures.

He’ll possible be a preferred goal for playoff groups selecting within the 30s, like Minnesota, Boston or Philadelphia, who might choose to stash a participant like Penda in Europe to protect roster flexibility. He’ll possible choose to return to the States instantly if he can discover a staff prepared to roster him, nevertheless.

Woo: Jamir Watkins is on the older aspect at 23-years-old, however he has been a contact undervalued. He is a wonderful perimeter defender who I believe will make sufficient pictures to stay on somebody’s bench. He’d be goal for a staff making an attempt to win subsequent season someplace within the 30s.

your Spherical 2 mock, what’s your favourite staff and participant suit you’ve projected?

Givony: Maxime Raynaud to the Celtics at No. 32 is sensible as an older, 7-foot prospect who can area the ground and doubtlessly be prepared to take in minutes after the Celtics traded Kristaps Porzingis to the Hawks.

With Luke Kornet coming into free company and the Celtics navigating a monetary tightrope, having a smaller wage slot with Raynaud would possible give the staff much-needed flexibility heading into the offseason.

Woo: Rasheer Fleming to the Timberwolves at No. 31 can be a pleasant worth play for Minnesota, which wants frontcourt reinforcements and may be capable of slide him into bench minutes out of the gate.

He is the kind of big-bodied shooter who might agency up the Wolves’ depth no matter what occurs with Naz Reid‘s free company. The primary decide of Spherical 2 is especially invaluable on this two-day draft period due to groups desirous to commerce up, but it surely may make sense to easily take the most effective participant out there.

Spherical 2 mock draft

Rasheer Fleming, F, Saint Joseph’s

Strengths: Fleming is a toolsy ahead with spectacular highlights who improved leaps and bounds over the previous three years, growing right into a extremely environment friendly inside-out scorer to enhance his large 7-foot-5 wingspan, which supplies him potential to develop into on the defensive finish.

Weaknesses: His really feel for the sport is a serious query mark, as he doesn’t course of the sport shortly on both finish of the ground. He typically struggles to make primary passes and is extremely mistake-prone off the ball defensively.

The decision: There is a premium on size, taking pictures and potential defensive versatility within the NBA, and Fleming might convey all three to a staff with the persistence to develop his consciousness and approach defensively whereas the sport hopefully slows down for him offensively. He struggled badly late within the season, however his relative youth and trajectory at St. Joseph’s leaves room for optimism about his potential. — Givony

Maxime Raynaud, C, Stanford

Strengths: Raynaud was late to the sport — he did not decide to the game full-time till his senior yr of highschool — however blossomed over 4 seasons at Stanford into a talented 7-footer who can area the ground and maintain his personal on the glass.

Weaknesses: The most important questions relating to his sport are on the defensive finish, the place he lacks some physicality and explosiveness, despite the fact that his motor appeared improved on the NBA draft mix.

The decision: After competing in France alongside his good good friend (and now San Antonio Spurs star) Victor Wembanyama in his youth, Raynaud has developed right into a official NBA expertise. He may be a late-bloomer, however he matches a coveted mould together with his dimension and taking pictures capacity, which supplies him a faster path to a task on the subsequent degree than some gamers who can be drafted earlier than him. How he performs defensively can be one thing to observe early on, as ground spacers like him can play an necessary position within the NBA. — Givony

Ryan Kalkbrenner, C, Creighton

Strengths: Kalkbrenner is an skilled middle whose capacity to function out of pick-and-roll, execute offensively, shield the rim and hit occasional 3-pointers makes him a dependable backup possibility.

Weaknesses: His 7-foot-6 wingspan is an asset, however he’s not overwhelmingly bodily or explosive, posting underwhelming defensive rebounding numbers for a lot of his faculty profession.

The decision: One of the environment friendly and invaluable gamers in faculty basketball over the previous a number of seasons, main Division I in dunks by a large margin, Kalkbrenner is a identified participant whose occasional flashes of floor-spacing potential added a invaluable dimension to his sport. He may need limitations, however his dimension, size and consistency on each ends of the ground can be interesting to a staff in search of rookie-contract depth on the middle place. — Givony

Noah Penda, F, France

Strengths: Penda is a strong-framed wing-forward with a wonderful really feel for the sport, a 6-foot-11.5 wingspan and defensive versatility who fills up the stat sheet with rebounds, assists, steals and blocks.

Weaknesses: He’s stronger than he’s vertically explosive and stays inconsistent from the perimeter, taking pictures the ball with unorthodox mechanics, changing beneath 30% of his 3-pointers this season and all through his profession.

The decision: Making the transition from Professional B to Professional A glance simple, Penda had a wonderful season for a playoff staff in France, making performs defensively and displaying the power to make use of his body and smarts to create for himself and others off the dribble. His taking pictures is a key swing ability, as he in any other case checks quite a lot of bins as a two-way contributor. — Givony

Tyrese Proctor, G, Duke

Strengths: Proctor is a sweet-shooting guard who performed a number of roles on the faculty degree, showcasing his capacity to perform on and off the ball.

Weaknesses: With a skinny body that did not evolve a lot in faculty and common bodily instruments, he has lengthy lacked a level of assertiveness and physicality on each ends, particularly in high-stakes moments.

The decision: Proctor’s positional dimension, enchancment as a spot-up shooter and flashes of capacity creating out of pick-and-rolls throughout his three collegiate seasons are intriguing, however he by no means fairly turned the nook as a degree guard. He should add toughness to have a significant position off the ball on the NBA degree. — Givony

Adou Thiero, PF, Arkansas

Strengths: Thiero is maybe essentially the most explosive participant on this draft, an occasion creator defensively who’s a big mismatch attacking in a straight line and the open court docket, drawing fouls in bunches and ending in highlight-reel trend.

Weaknesses: Considerably caught between ahead positions, Thiero is a piece in progress together with his ability degree, really feel for the sport and defensive engagement. He struggled to make pictures constantly and missed a lot of the predraft course of with a lingering knee subject.

The decision: Thiero confirmed vital progress as a junior, however should make strides together with his taking pictures and general consistency to play a task on the NBA degree. His defensive upside is clear given his bodily instruments, and his trajectory over his three collegiate seasons makes him an attention-grabbing developmental swing. — Givony

Chaz Lanier, SG, Tennessee, tremendous senior

Strengths: Lanier is a harmful motion shooter with strong bodily instruments. He has proved himself as a prolific shotmaker within the SEC after he transferred from North Florida to Tennessee.

Weaknesses: He has inquiries to reply together with his really feel for the sport, passing and defensive prowess, struggling to impression the sport on nights his outdoors pictures weren’t falling.

The decision: A real late-bloomer who averaged 3.7 factors per sport over his first three collegiate seasons, Lanier turned a nook together with his jumper as an upperclassman to enhance his strong dimension, body and 6-foot-9 wingspan. He’s not a lot of a ball handler and might want to make the most of his instruments higher defensively, however he has a transparent area of interest to fill with the way in which he can area the ground and shoot off screens. — Givony

38. Indiana Pacers (through San Antonio)

Jamir Watkins, SG/SF, Florida State, senior

Strengths: Watkins is a stout defender with a wonderful body and a 6-foot-11 wingspan who stuffed up the field rating impressively at Florida State.

Weaknesses: The 23-year-old was productive as a secondary ball handler final season however has by no means been capable of finding consistency together with his outdoors shot, hitting simply 32.5% of his profession 3-pointers on the faculty degree.

The decision: Few gamers helped themselves on the NBA mix as a lot as Watkins as he introduced physicality and high-level depth defensively whereas making performs all around the court docket. Turning 24 in early July, his NBA-ready body and instruments give him a right away ability he can cling his hat on, however discovering a strategy to rating constantly within the half court docket can be important to him sticking long run. — Givony

John Tonje, SF, Wisconsin, tremendous senior

Strengths: Tonje is a solidly constructed wing with good dimension, size and aggressiveness, coming off a breakout season at Wisconsin wherein he emerged as probably the greatest scorers in faculty basketball.

Weaknesses: He’s not a lot of a passer and lacks nice instruments defensively, counting on a bully-ball type that may work higher as a 24-year-old in faculty than in opposition to NBA opponents.

The decision: Tonje had an amazing season for the Badgers, attending to the road and making 39% of his 3-pointers with robust quantity. His 41-point effort in opposition to Arizona on Nov. 15 was one of many extra memorable single-game efforts of the season. His maturity could possibly be an asset within the correct position, however he nonetheless has issues to show on each ends of the ground for NBA functions, because the observe file of older gamers on this mould is decidedly combined traditionally. — Givony

Bogoljub Markovic, PF/C, Mega Superbet (Adriatic)

Strengths: Markovic is a talented massive man who scored from all around the ground with spectacular effectivity in his first season within the Adriatic League, profitable the equal of rookie of the yr.

Weaknesses: With a 6-foot-11 wingspan and a slim body, he struggles to constantly make his presence felt defensively and on the glass, typically trying a step gradual together with his consciousness on each ends.

The decision: Markovic had a breakout yr culminating in a robust displaying on the Nike Hoop Summit. At his greatest, his capacity to area the ground, push off the defensive glass and end skillfully within the paint is intriguing, however he’ll have to make progress together with his physicality, really feel for the sport and toughness to utilize these instruments on the highest ranges. — Givony

Rocco Zikarsky, C, Brisbane (Australia)

Strengths: Zikarsky is simply as younger, 18, as he’s massively sized, with a budding ability degree and apparent potential defensively, because of his gigantic 9-foot-6½ standing attain.

Weaknesses: Whereas his dimension is a big asset within the paint on each ends of the ground, he doesn’t transfer his ft significantly effectively in area or present as a lot physicality as one may hope, typically showing a step behind the motion due to a ignorance.

The decision: Zikarsky did not have as productive a second season within the NBL as most scouts had hoped he would. Though he was a constant issue on the offensive glass, he struggled to attain effectively, lacking layups and struggling to make free throws, which hindered among the optimism surrounding his floor-stretching potential. His capacity to impact pictures together with his distinctive size is interesting, however he’s nonetheless evolving as a rim protector when he is not parked beneath the rim. Regardless, his dimension and youth make him an intriguing guess for a staff that believes in its participant growth infrastructure, serving to the sport decelerate for him whereas his body continues to mature. — Givony

Koby Brea, SG/SF, Kentucky, tremendous senior

Strengths: Brea has been the most effective shooter in faculty basketball over the previous two seasons, hitting 47% of his 3s, whereas boasting strong bodily instruments.

Weaknesses: As efficient as he’s as a ground spacer, his unfavourable wingspan, common protection and explosiveness restrict his role-player potential.

The decision: After making 50% of his 3s at Dayton in 2023-24, Brea backed up his efficiency with one other wonderful taking pictures season for Kentucky (2024-25). He is a standout ground spacer and motion shooter in an period wherein shooters in his mould are at a premium. What he can convey past his taking pictures will dictate how shortly he finds a task within the NBA. — Givony

43. Washington Wizards (from Utah, through Dallas)

Sion James, SF, Duke, tremendous senior

Strengths: James performed an important position for Duke together with his regular ballhandling, unselfishness, defensive versatility and opportunistic scoring. He added much-needed expertise and toughness together with his ripped body.

Weaknesses: He has by no means been a really prolific scorer, missing nice size and dynamic shot creation, whereas having inquiries to reply about simply how good a shooter he’s, given his crude mechanics and the way considered he was about letting pictures fly from the perimeter.

The decision: James performed an analogous position for the Blue Devils as he possible will on the subsequent degree, guarding a number of positions, staying energetic off the ball and looking out greater than prepared to do the little issues. He’s not exceptionally lengthy, however he matches a singular mould bodily, which could possibly be an asset for a staff on the lookout for a utility participant, particularly if he takes one other step as a spot-up menace. — Givony

Johni Broome, C, Auburn, tremendous senior

Strengths: Broome is a bodily and extremely productive inside-outside menace with really feel for the sport. A finalist for the Wood Award, he was the most effective participant in faculty basketball for stretches at a time final season.

Weaknesses: Missing nice size and explosiveness, Broome bought by on timing and tenacity in faculty however may be extra of a situational match on each ends of the ground within the NBA, particularly if his unconventional taking pictures mechanics and profession 30% 3-point share do not translate.

The decision: It’s laborious to understate simply how efficient Broome was this season. Minor accidents hampered him late, however his instincts as a scorer, passer and rebounder have been obvious all through. His streaky taking pictures and restricted defensive instruments considerably complicate his NBA match, however he’s among the many most confirmed prospects on this draft. — Givony

Alex Toohey, SF/PF, Sydney (Australia)

Strengths: Toohey is an clever, versatile ahead whose maturity stood out each within the NBL and on the NBA mix.

Weaknesses: Simply a mean athlete, he has made strides as a shooter. He might want to grow to be extra constant from past the arc to carve out a task on the NBA degree, although.

The decision: Toohey checks some bins together with his really feel for the sport, constant motor, size and anticipation on the defensive finish. He has sharp basketball instincts, however he’ll have to grow to be a extra constantly aggressive and impactful offensive menace to make use of them in an NBA position — one thing he took a step in the correct route with this previous yr. — Givony

Kam Jones, PG/SG, Marquette, senior

Strengths: Jones had a productive, environment friendly season orchestrating Marquette’s five-out spacing, making massive pictures and scoring prolifically en path to a first-team All-Huge East marketing campaign.

Weaknesses: He’s not essentially the most explosive guard and took a step again as a shooter in an expanded position this season, having some inquiries to reply about his protection and skill to create effectively in a extra compact position.

The decision: The senior answered the decision on the ball this season, rating among the many greatest pick-and-roll creators within the nation, after working primarily off the ball a season in the past. His decisiveness as a passer and scorer stood out, however his streaky taking pictures from past the arc and middling defensive impression give him some areas to work on as he appears to reveal that his sport interprets to greater ranges of competitors. — Givony

Javon Small, PG, West Virginia, senior

Strengths: Small is a tricky, well-rounded guard who exhibited a number of robust role-playing qualities, carrying an undermanned West Virginia staff together with his protection and skill to create off the dribble this season.

Weaknesses: He has achieved what he can together with his body however doesn’t possess nice dimension, size or bulk by NBA requirements.

The decision: Small had a standout season within the Huge 12, showcasing the burst to attain in bunches and arrange others on a roster that relied on him to do each. Efficiently managing that duty whereas nonetheless offering power defensively, he possesses attraction for groups in search of guard depth. His capacity to take one other step as a shooter, finisher and decision-maker is a focal point, as he’s not fairly large enough to rely solely on his protection. — Givony

Micah Peavy, SG/SF, Georgetown, senior

Strengths: Peavy is a flexible wing with strong dimension who defends with high-level depth and made notable strides in 3-point taking pictures as a fifth-year senior.

Weaknesses: Peavy has unorthodox mechanics on his jumper, hitting 32% from 3 and 61% from the free throw line for his faculty profession, with lackluster effectivity contained in the arc. Whereas his motor translated in quite a lot of methods on the faculty degree, he lacks nice size for NBA functions, with a fair wingspan. He turns 24 on July 16.

The decision: Within the third cease of his faculty profession, Peavy saved Georgetown afloat at occasions final season together with his assertive, opportunistic scoring, displaying versatility discovering teammates and making extra pictures than anticipated from past the arc. His profession struggles from the free throw line, at-times adventurous decision-making and age are issues. Nonetheless, the dearth of gamers in his mould will give him alternatives to indicate his sport interprets to greater ranges of competitors — Givony

Vladislav Goldin, C, Michigan, tremendous senior

Strengths: Goldin is a chiseled middle with nice dimension and size whose motor and productiveness made him a key participant in a number of NCAA match runs.

Weaknesses: Goldin strikes effectively and might play above the rim with a head of steam, however he lacks quickness guarding in area and pursuing rebounds. His lack of perimeter ability limits his versatility, as he’s not an excellent passer and would not have a lot vary on his jumper at this stage. At 24, he is one of many oldest gamers on this class.

The decision: Goldin was a power rolling to the rim and on the offensive glass, as his depth degree and dimension on the rim could be imposing, even when he’s not essentially the most fluid or coordinated athlete. Whereas he experimented with a jumper at occasions as a fifth-year senior, the Russian middle with a 7-foot-5 wingspan matches a extra conventional mould on each ends, making his capacity to anchor a protection and clear the glass constantly necessary on the subsequent degree. — Givony

Lachlan Olbrich, PF/C, Illawarra

Strengths: Olbrich is a throwback massive man with a robust motor and really feel for the sport whose enchancment this season helped the Illawarra Hawks to the NBL championship.

Weaknesses: With out the size to play middle (6-foot-11 wingspan) and a scarcity of floor-spacing capacity for an influence ahead, he’s considerably caught between positions on each ends and would not possess nice explosiveness to compensate.

The decision: Olbrich returned to Australia after a productive freshman yr within the Huge West. He has come a good distance since, displaying wonderful passing capacity, a robust inside ability degree and the trouble and physicality to get by defensively. His capacity to determine easy methods to hold defenders sincere from the perimeter will possible be essential for his NBA probabilities, given his lack of bodily defensive instruments. — Givony

Eric Dixon, PF, Villanova, tremendous senior

Strengths: Dixon is a wide-bodied energy ahead who had a wildly productive season, main the nation in scoring as a sixth-year senior. He is making an apparent leap as a shooter.

Weaknesses: His 6-foot-11½ wingspan, common bodily traits and inconsistent defensive impression are limiting elements.

The decision: Scoring prolifically from the perimeter at 259 kilos this season, Dixon labored himself from a reluctant shooter into essentially the most dynamic taking pictures massive man within the nation over the course of his faculty profession. His capacity to rediscover among the physicality and toughness he demonstrated earlier in his profession as a rebounder and defender in a extra minor position can be extremely useful in carving out a publish within the NBA. — Givony

Alijah Martin, SG, Florida, senior

Strengths: Martin is a robust, explosive wing whose shotmaking and defensive versatility performed a key position in Florida’s championship run.

Weaknesses: Whereas he has a 6-foot-7½ wingspan, Martin is not an excellent ball handler or passer for his dimension. He has been liable to streakiness at occasions from past the arc.

The decision: Bouncy, bodily and hard, Martin had some robust two-way efforts, particularly when his shot was falling at a excessive fee. Enjoying greater than his listed top defensively and making spectacular performs in area, his bodily instruments have been an asset on the faculty degree, however he’ll should grow to be a extra dependable shooter or efficient playmaker to ease his transition to the NBA. — Givony

53. Utah Jazz (through LA Clippers)

Amari Williams, C, Kentucky, senior

Strengths: Williams is a British middle with an attention-grabbing mixture of size (7-foot-6 wingspan), rebounding prowess, shot-blocking timing and really feel as a passer.

Weaknesses: Not a lot of a scorer outdoors of his capacity to attract fouls because of his superior dimension, he would not have any vary on his jumper, by no means improved as a free throw shooter (profession 63%) and would not convey as a lot defensive versatility as scouts may hope he would. He struggled when pressured to step outdoors the paint and canopy floor and wasn’t all the time nice enjoying with depth or consciousness.

The decision: Williams won’t be adept at making fast rotations as a rim protector or flipping his hips on the perimeter, however he has wonderful bodily instruments and ranked among the many greatest rebounders within the nation in his lone season at Kentucky. Mix that together with his capacity as a set off man in handoffs and his capacity to play above the rim on the transfer and he’s an attention-grabbing situational match for some groups. — Givony

Dink Pate, SG/SF, Mexico Metropolis (G League)

Strengths: Pate, 19, is a swingman with intriguing bodily instruments and a robust highschool pedigree who has upside to develop into long run.

Weaknesses: Pate is at an early stage of growth together with his taking pictures, protection, decision-making and all-around consistency, being miscast as a degree guard earlier in his profession and thrust right into a tough scenario within the G League because the youngest participant in that league for 2 consecutive years.

The decision: Pate had a couple of productive video games for the Mexico Metropolis Capitanes after combating an uphill battle for the G League Ignite final season. He flashed capacity to weave his strategy to the rim in transition, made some easy performs off the dribble and bought sizzling from the perimeter at occasions, however he has loads of issues to wash up on each ends of the ground as he stays inexperienced in some ways. Even so, his youth and flash give him intrigue for groups that imagine of their participant growth. — Givony

Viktor Lakhin, C, Clemson, tremendous senior

Strengths: Lakhin is a flexible massive man and fifth-year senior who made actual strides as a shooter to enhance his inside ability degree, in addition to his passing and defensive timing.

Weaknesses: He’s not significantly quick or explosive, being considerably caught between positions. He has relied on timing and craft on the faculty degree, which could not translate seamlessly in opposition to higher athletes. He has had a number of accidents over the previous few years, lacking a lot of the predraft course of with a ligament tear in his foot that can sideline him for a number of months.

The decision: Lakhin had a terrific season, doing a bit of little bit of the whole lot together with his really feel for the sport, final touch and maturity on the defensive finish. His enchancment as a ground spacer is notable. The shortage of pattern dimension together with his jumper means he’ll want to remain wholesome and show this a part of his sport is actual to carve out a significant position within the NBA. — Givony

Hunter Sallis, SG, Wake Forest, senior

Strengths: Sallis is a skinny guard with a 6-foot-10 wingspan, nice confidence in his pull-up jumper and a strong motor defensively.

Weaknesses: After taking pictures the three at a wonderful 41% clip a yr in the past, he struggled badly this season (28%), ending his faculty profession changing simply 33% of his general makes an attempt via 4 years, all whereas not being an excellent shot creator or passer.

The decision: Sallis did not make the leap that scouts have been hoping for after passing up second-round alternatives a yr in the past to return to Wake Forest, the place he performed a high-usage position comparatively inefficiently however nonetheless discovered methods to make an impression together with his power defensively and on the glass. There are features to understand about his size and flexibility, however enhancing his body and constantly demonstrating the power to make pictures from outdoors can be key for him to carve out a distinct segment long run. — Givony

Kobe Sanders, SG/SF, Nevada, senior

Strengths: Sanders has wonderful dimension for a guard who performed on the ball as a lot as he did in his lone season at Nevada.

Weaknesses: He has a unfavourable wingspan and is a participant with common expertise, which confirmed up totally on the defensive finish and typically in his poor shot choice.

The decision: Sanders had a terrific season as a grad switch utilizing his dimension and skill to play with tempo to create off the dribble. He was one of many high midrange scorers within the nation, however might want to make strides together with his decision-making and spot-up taking pictures to ease his transition to the NBA. On the subsequent degree, he’ll face one other studying curve defensively if he would not add extra toughness and physicality to his sport. — Givony

Saliou Niang, SG/SF, Trento (Italy)

Strengths: Niang is a bodily gifted wing on a powerful trajectory who emerged from obscurity and developed into an impactful participant within the Italian League and EuroCup for Trento.

Weaknesses: His offensive profile is questionable, as he has little taking pictures vary, hitting 11 3-pointers in 45 video games whereas posting extra turnovers than assists.

The decision: Niang’s defensive versatility, rebounding and depth enabled him to contribute in opposition to high-level competitors this season, discovering methods to contribute on each ends regardless of missing vital offensive polish. He’ll possible have to search out some sort of taking pictures vary to have any probability of enjoying a task within the NBA, however he has upside to faucet into based mostly on the development he has proven the previous two years. — Givony

Ryan Nembhard, PG, Gonzaga, senior

Strengths: Nembhard is a cerebral level guard who led Division I in assists and confirmed his playmaking imaginative and prescient vividly within the G League Elite Camp and NBA mix scrimmages.

Weaknesses: Standing at 6-foot in footwear, he lacks nice dimension, power, size and explosiveness, limiting him as a finisher contained in the paint and defensively.

The decision: Nembhard may be behind from a bodily perspective, however he is in all probability essentially the most established ground common on this draft. His gaudy 3.9 assist-to-turnover ratio and the way in which he passes folks open stood out consistently final season. His polish as a distributor alone ought to discover him a distinct segment to fill on the subsequent degree, however his capacity to grow to be greater than an opportunistic shooter might assist solidify his standing. — Givony

Jonathan Givony is an NBA draft skilled and the founder and co-owner of DraftExpress.com, a non-public scouting and analytics service utilized by NBA, NCAA and worldwide groups.

Jeremy Woo is an NBA analyst specializing in prospect analysis and the draft. He was beforehand a employees author and draft insider at Sports activities Illustrated.