United States coach Mauricio Pochettino was fuming after his facet misplaced 2-1 to Mexico within the Concacaf Gold Cup remaining on Sunday, adamant a penalty ought to have been given for handball.
It wasn’t the top of the VAR drama for his crew, as Edson Álvarez‘s objective was initially dominated out for offside — just for the video assistant to step in and award his match-winning 77th-minute effort.
Pochettino’s gripe referred to an incident within the 66th minute when the rating was locked at 1-1. Mexico defender Jorge Sánchez touched the ball along with his hand inside his personal space, however each the referee and the VAR ignored claims for a spot kick.
“The reality was that if that occurred within the reverse half, within the different field, for positive it is a penalty,” Pochettino complained. “The participant was with a knee on the ground, he pushed the hand over the ball. It is not that the hand was [already] on the ground, and the ball touched.
“For me, it was embarrassing to see that state of affairs and it is a disgrace. I perceive that perhaps 70,000 folks [in the stands], you already know, giving this penalty, it is not simple.”
Did Pochettino have some extent?
Doable penalty: Handball by Sánchez
What occurred: Max Arfsten was in possession and moved into the field underneath stress from Sánchez and Roberto Alvarado. Sánchez bought his foot to the ball to take it off the wing-back, however his hand landed on high of it. Referee Mario Escobar made it clear he felt Sánchez had solely touched the ball due to his supporting arm, and it was checked by the VAR, Benjamin Pineda.
VAR resolution: No penalty.
Ought to this have been known as a handball? 🤔 pic.twitter.com/nqlOWRI53F
— FOX Soccer (@FOXSoccer) July 7, 2025
VAR assessment: The handball legislation has change into complicated in current seasons, primarily as a result of lots of the exemptions in opposition to an offense are actually hidden in steerage to officers slightly than showing within the textual content of the Legal guidelines of the Sport.
One such issue a referee has to take note of is whether or not the hand or arm touches the ball when it’ll the bottom to help the physique. So, a participant does not have to maneuver his arm out of the best way and crash to the ground: nevertheless, he should be capable to cease his fall.
That hand or arm does not already need to keep in touch with the bottom when it is hit by the ball, as Pochettino urged, as a result of it is pure {that a} participant would prolong an arm when falling to the bottom. Certainly, the IFAB’s personal illustration of the exemption does not have the arm involved with the grass.
Nevertheless, that does not give a defender carte blanche to the touch the ball as they’re falling; there must be a consideration for the participant intentionally ensuring their arm stops the ball, or shifting it towards the ball.
Sánchez would argue that there was such a short while between his collision with Arfsten and his hand touching the ball that there was nothing he may do. However he’s all the time wanting on the ball, and his arm appeared to increase into its path. It ought to have been a penalty on VAR assessment.
Judging simply how deliberate the act is in these circumstances is not essentially simple.
There are clear similarities to a handball by Arsenal‘s Martin Ødegaard at Liverpool in December 2023. The midfielder was inside his personal space and underneath stress from Mohamed Salah, and his hand knocked the ball away. The referee’s on-field opinion was supported by the VAR as a result of Ødegaard was making an attempt to maintain his stability and the handball was subsequently deemed unintentional — the refereeing physique within the Premier League later admitted {that a} spot kick ought to have been awarded.
For Ødegaard see Sánchez, two choices whereby the VAR is making an attempt to learn the intentions of the defending participant and has chosen to stay with the on-field view, but each ought to have been spot kicks.
We did see the VAR step in on the 2022 FIFA World Cup, although this was accepted as a mistaken intervention. Portugal got a controversial late penalty in opposition to Uruguay when José María Giménez slid in to make a problem and the ball got here off his arm that was going to the bottom as he was falling backward, stopping Bruno Fernandes‘ move. The referee did not give the spot kick, however it was controversially given on VAR assessment regardless of there being critical doubt that there was any intent by Giménez to cease the ball, slightly than purely help the physique.